CURRENT STATUS AND CHALLENGES OF CORPORATE INVESTMENT RISK

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2025-4.26

Keywords:

investment risk, risk management, ESG, case study, industry risk, risk mitigation

Abstract

Corporate investment decision-making is undergoing a fundamental transformation as traditional risk models fail to account for today's complex global challenges. This paper examines how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors have become critical determinants of investment success in an era of geopolitical volatility, technological disruption, and climate transition. Through detailed case analysis of major investment failures – including WeWork's governance collapse and energy companies facing stranded assets – we demonstrate how ESG risks directly destroy shareholder value. Our research identifies industry-specific risk patterns: energy companies confront transition risks, manufacturers face supply chain vulnerabilities, and technology firms grapple with data governance challenges. The findings reveal that ESG integration provides not just risk mitigation but competitive advantage, enabling companies to navigate regulatory changes, enhance operational resilience, and access sustainable financing. We propose a comprehensive framework for embedding ESG factors throughout investment processes, combining quantitative modeling with qualitative assessment. This approach enables investors to better price previously externalized risks while identifying new opportunities in the green transition. The study concludes that sophisticated ESG integration is no longer optional but essential for long-term value creation, requiring upgraded risk management systems, specialized expertise, and cultural transformation within organizations. As global sustainability regulations intensify and stakeholder expectations evolve, companies that proactively embrace ESG-informed investment strategies will gain durable competitive advantages in increasingly transparent markets.

References

Cao Z. Problems and Countermeasures in the Post-Evaluation Management of Enterprise Investment Projects. Project Cost Management. 2025. 36(04), 24–28. DOI: 10.19730/j.cnki.1008-2166.2025-04-024.

Chen W. A Summary of Enterprise Project Investment Decision-Making Methods – Also on the Four-Dimensional Decision Framework System. Industrial Technology & Economy. 2011. 30(01), 150–156.

Chen C., Xu J. Evaluation System and Application of Digital Transformation Capability of Manufacturing Enterprises. Science and Technology Management Research. 2020. 40(11), 46–51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2020.11.007.

Feng X., Meng X. Analysis of the Impact Mechanism of Innovation Incentive Policies on Green Technology Innovation. Science and Technology Management Research. 2024. 44(24), 29–37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2024.24.004

Harms P., Knaze J. Bilateral de-jure exchange rate regimes and foreign direct investment: A gravity analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2021. 117, 102438. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102438.

Luo B. Internal Control, Investor Sentiment and Corporate Investment Efficiency. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. 2017. (06), 11–20+158.

Li, H. Wang Yao: ESG is an Important Factor for Judging Enterprises by Non-financial Indicators. Technology and Finance. 2023. (03), 8–13+7.

Yuan K., Liu M., Cui J. Can the Servitization Transformation of Advanced Manufacturing Enhance Export Resilience? – Empirical Evidence from the Cross-National Level. Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics. 2025. 32(05), 5–23. DOI: 10.16060/j.cnki.issn2095-8072.2025.05.001.

Ye Q., Li Y., Lu H., et al. Evolution Characteristics of the Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Humanities and Social Science Research in China: Analysis Based on National Social Science Foundation Project Approval Data. Science and Technology Management Research. 2024. 44(24), 224–232. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2024.24.024.

Zhang G. Technological Change, Paradigm Shift and the Technological Catch-up of China's Industries. China Soft Science. (03), 2013. 53–65.

Zhang L. Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategies for Green Supply Chain Finance in the Energy Industry Based on the ESG Framework. Business Observation. 2025. 11(18), 90–93+120. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-0808.2025.18.016.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16