THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE SOY DEPENDING ON ITS PART IN THE CROPS AND FERTILIZATION SYSTEM IN THE CONDITIONS OF NORTH STEPPE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2023-1.4

Keywords:

productivity, crop rotation, soy saturation, fertilizing system, crop productivity

Abstract

The implementation in the production of the soy crops of short rotation and using fertilizers is the actual question of the agriculture. Nowadays there are some programs that can increase the soil fertility. But, the question of effective use of by-products of different crops in the conditions of it’ combination with the mineral fertilizers in the short crop rotations in the zones of dampness shortage of the North steppe of Ukraine are still not learnt, that’s why they need to be explored. Soy crop capacity in the short crop rotation is defined by the level of saturation in the crops. Greatly higher level of the soy crops had the maximum marks in the classic grain-steam-row crop rotation by organic-mineral system of fertilizers and was 2,53 tons per hectare for 5 years. Defined that the average soy crop capacity in the grain-steam-row crop rotation № 1with the soy saturation of 20 % was the greatest and was 2,35 tons per hectare. Crop rotation factor depending on the fertilizing system, provided the increase of crop productivity of soy by the previous winter wheat from 0,43 to 0,75 t/h. The augmentation of concentration of soy in the crops lead to having less crop productivity, in the grain-stream-row № 2 was the shortage of soy to grain-stream-row crop rotation № 1 and was 0,56 t/h and in the grain-steam-row crop rotation № 3 was 0,62 t/h. In the crop rotation with the highest saturation of soy (60 %) the biggest augmentation provided using organic-mineral system of fertilizers 0,76 t/h (55,7 %). Defined, that different types of fertilizers and different concentration of soy in the crop rotations influence it’s productivity. The biggest gather of grain units was in grain-steam-row crop rotation with the soy saturation up to 20 % 3,97– 4,78 t/h. With the increase of soy concentration in the crops received the great shortage in the grain units, which was the lowest in the grain-row crop rotation with the soy saturation of 60 %. Greatly bigger outcome of grain units was in the grain-row crop rotation (soy 60 %) with using organicmineral fertilization system (+1,42 t/h or 55,7 % compared to the example without fertilizers). The biggest gathers of fodder units and digestible protein were by growing soy in the grain-steam-row crop rotation with the saturation of soy up to 20 % at the background of organic-mineral system of fertilizers 3,69 and 0,81. Thus, the implementation in the agriculture the crops with soy saturation of 20 % without using fertilizers or grain-row crop rotations with saturation of 60 % and using organic-mineral system of fertilizers gives an opportunity to have the crop productivity of 2,11 t/h. The biggest productivity was 4,78 t/h, forded units 4,12 t/h and digestible protein 0,81 t/h, received by growing soy in the grain-steam-row crop rotation with soy concentration of 20 % with organic-mineral fertilizing system.

References

Nutrient uptake, partitioning, and remobilization in modern soybean varieties / R.R. Bender et al. Agronomy Journal. 2015. № 107 (2). P. 563–573. URK: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US202000167910.

Nutrient management practices for enhancing soybean (Glycine max L.) production / A. Farid et al. Acta biol. Colomb. 2013. № 18 (2). P. 239–250. URL: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3190/319028011013.pdf.

Ferguson R.B. EC06-155 nutrient management for agronomic crops in Nebraska. Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. 2006. P. 121–126.

Goldsmith P.D. Economics of Soybean Production, Marketing, and Utilization. Soybeans: Chemistry, Production, Processing, and Utilization. 2008. P. 117–150. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-893997-64-6.50008-1.

Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean-worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests / G.L. Hartman et al. Food Security. 2011. № 3 (1). P. 5–17. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-010-0108-x.

Hymowitz T, Singh R.J. Taxonomy and speciation. Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. 2’nd ed. Madison, (Agronomy). WI : ASA, CSSA, SSSA, 1987.

7. Staton Michael, Steinke Kurt. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizer recommendations for high-yielding, profitable soybeans. Michigan State University Extension. March 12, 2021. URL: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/ phosphorus_and_potassium_fertilizer_recommendations_for_high_yielding_profi.

Nabiev T.N., Asrorov А.J. Efficiency of the application of mineral fertilizers on the productivity of soy and mung bean (mash) in the conditions of the sogd region of the republic of Tajikistan. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. 254. 05014. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125405014.

Managing inputs for peak production / J.H. Orf et al. Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. 3’rd ed. (Agronomy). Madison, WI : ASA, CSSA, SSSA, 2004. P. 451–525.

Pedersen P., Lauer J.G. Soybean growth and development response to rotation sequence and tillage system. Agron. 2004. J. 96. P. 1005–1012.

Ustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean–wheat system of the Indian Himalayas / Ranjan Bhattacharyya et al. January European Journal of Agronomy. 2008. № 28 (1). P. 33–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.04.006.

The effect of organic fertilizers on growth several varieties of soybeans / M. Rizwan et al. International Seminar on Agriculture, Biodiversity, Food Security and Health. IOP Conf. Series “Earth and Environmental Science”. IOP Publishing, 2021. 883. 012051. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/883/1/012051.

Şahane Funda Arslanoglu. The effects on the root and plant development of soybean of organic fertilizer applications. Bioscience Journal. 2022. Vol. 38. e38036. DOI: 10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-60382.

Sexton P. A look at crop rotation and soybean production. SDSU Extension Soybeans: Best Management Practices for Soybean Production. 2013. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. URL: https://extension.sdstate.edu/sites/default/files/2020-03/S-0004-04-Soybean.pdf.

Soybean Production, Versatility, and Improvement / Zachary Shea et al. Legume Crops. Submitted: November 22’nd, 2019. Reviewed: February 16’th, 2020. Published: March 19’th, 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91778.

Soybean Production, Versatility, and Improvement / Zachary Shea et al. From the edited volume Legume Crops. Submitted: November 22’nd, 2019. Reviewed: February 16’th, 2020. Published: March 19’th, 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91778.

Effects of rhizobia inoculation and nitrogen fertilization on photosynthetic physiology of soybean / X.-J. Zhou et al. Photosynthetica. 2006. № 44 (4). P. 530–535. URL: https://ps.ueb.cas.cz/pdfs/phs/2006/04/04.pdf.

Андрієнко А.Л., Мащенко Ю.В. Вплив різного насичення сівозмін соєю на її продуктивність. Агроном. 2011. № 1. С. 140.

Ефективність короткоротаційних сівозмін при різних системах удобрення у зоні недостатнього зволоження Правобережного Степу України / Ю.В. Мащенко та ін. Зернові культури. 2022. № 1. С. 169–176.

Вплив систем удобрення та мікробних препаратів на продуктивність сої при різному насиченні нею сівозмін / Ю.В. Мащенко та ін. Бюлетень Інституту зернового господарства. 2011. № 40. С. 133–138.

Published

2023-06-16