SQUARE OF LEAF SURFACE OF PEA DEPENDING ON TECHNOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE WESTERN FOREST STEPPE

Authors

  • Yurii Khmelianchyshyn
  • Кateryna Nebaba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2021-2-3

Keywords:

pea, mineral fertilizers, regulators of growth, leaf surface area, yield capacity.

Abstract

Active leaf activity,stipules and whiskers of allows the development of production processes in plants and significantly affects the intensity of photosynthesis during the growing season. Optimal growth and development of plants, that affects the accumulation of organic matter and level of supply of mineral nutrients also depents of leaf surface square. The results of researches where was learned the square of leaf surface and its influence to yield of modern varieties of pea depending on different doses of mineral fertilizers and growth regulators in the conditions of the western forest steppe are presented in the article . Experimental part was conducted during 2016-2018 on the research field of the Training and Production Center "Podillya" PDU. The soil of the research field – is chernozem chernic, deep глибокий low humus, heavy loam on woody loams. It’s set out, that square of leaf surface of pea varieties Gotovsky, Chekbek and Fargus depented on \ varietal features of culture and technological measures which were applied in the reserch. Spraying of crops of PlantaPeg, Emistim C and Vimpel growth regulators in microstages ВВСН 55-65 has provided active formation of the leaf surface area of pea plants. During the growing season the square of assimilation surface has grown and reached досягла maximum values in microstages ВВСН 60-65. The actions of the PlantaPeg regulator in plants of the Gotovsky variety the aquare og leaf surface fluctuateв from 176,4 til 330,2 square centimeters per plant, Chekbek – from 218,3 till 394,5 square centimeters per plant and Fargus – from 167,2 till 317,0 square centimeters per plant. In plants sprayed with Emistim C, the leaf surface area increased from 190.6 to 407.5 cm2 / plant, depending on the varieties, but the growth regulator Vimpel worked best on all studied varieties of peas - sowing ranged from 218.0 to 415.1 cm2 / plant.

References

Pilipenko V.S., Kalenskaya, S.M. (2017). Leaf surface area and photosynthetic potential of pea plants depending on fertilizer and seed inoculation. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, № 4, 17–22. Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vaan_2017_4_5.Razaq, M., Zhang, P., Shen, H., & Salahuddin. (2017). Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLOS ONE, 12 (2), e0171321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171321

Di Paolo, E., Garofalo, P., & Rinaldi, M. (2015). Irrigation and nitrogen fertilization treatments on productive and qualitative traits of broad bean (Vicia fabavar.minorL.) in a Mediterranean environment. Legume Research, 38 (2), 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00069.7

Nebaba, K.S. (2020). Formation of photosynthetic apparatus of sowing peas depending on technological methods in the conditions of the Western Forest-Steppe. Sustainable Nature Management, 3, 139–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.3.2020.

Kumar, K., & Goh, K. M. (2000). Biological nitrogen fixation, accumulation of soil nitrogen and nitrogen balance for white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown for seed. Field Crops Research, 68, Is. 1, 49-59.

Yeremko L.S., Gangur, V.V., Kyrychok O.O., Sokyrko D.P. (2019). Mineral nutrition as a factor in increasing photosynthetic productivity and yield of pea crops. Bulletin of the PDAA, 3, 50−56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2019.03.06

Koshkin, E.I. (2005). Private physiology of field crops. Textbook. allowance. Moscow: Kolos.

Nichiporovich, A.A. (1972). Photosynthetic activity of plants and ways to increase their productivity. Theoretical foundations of photosynthetic productivity. Moscow: Nauka.

Gangur, V.V., Yeremko, L.S., & Saenko, V.O. (2021). Dynamics of leaf surface formation of sowing rate and productivity of its photosynthetic activity depending on the level of mineral nutrition. Agrarian innovations. № 8. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2021.8.3

Dospekhov, B.A. (1985). Methods of field experience. Moscow: Agropromizdat.

Nichiporovich, A.A. (1972). Photosynthetic activity of plants and ways to increase their productivity. Theoretical foundations of photosynthetic productivity. Moscow: Nauka.

Mazur, V., Didur, I., Myalkovsky, R., Pantsyreva, H., Telekalo, N., & Tkach, O. (2020). The Productivity of intensive pea varieties depending on the seeds treatment and foliar fertilizing under conditions of right-bank forest-steppe Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(1), 101-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/2020_16

Girka, A.D., Tkalich, ID, Sidorenko, Yu.Ya. [etc.]. (2018). Current aspects of pea growing technology in the northern steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 2, 31-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201802-05.

Chynchyk, O., Olifirovych, S., Olifirovych, V., Nebaba K. (2021). Biological Nitrogen in Increasing the Productivity of Beans (Grains). UREKA: Life Sciences, 5, 12-17. DOI:10.21303/2504- 5695.2021.002075.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-08