THE INFLUENCE OF THE PLACEMENT SCHEME AND PLANT DENSITY ON YIELD AND BIOMETRIC INDICATORS OF THE COMMON MELON (CUCUMIS MELO L.) IN THE RIGHT BANK FOREST STEPPE OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2025-2.21

Keywords:

common melon, placement scheme, productivity, stem length

Abstract

The article highlights the results of the study of the impact of the arrangement of melon plants on productivity and biometric indicators. The research was conducted in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine (Uman, 48°46′N, 30°14′E) in 2023–2024. For the study the early-ripening melon hybrid Amal F1, intended for fresh consumption, which is considered one of the most popular melon hybrids in Ukrainian supermarket chains, was used. The research used the following plant placement schemes 1.4+0.4×0.5 m (K), 1.6+0.4×0.5 m, 1.8+0.4×0.5 m, 2 ,0+0.4×0.5 m, 2.2+0.4×0.5 m, 2.4+0.4×0.5 m. During the growing season, stem length was determined in different phenological phases of plant development, fruit weight, and productivity. Field and laboratory research methods were used to conduct the research. The experiment is laid out in accordance with the research methodology. As a result of research, it was established that the length of the stem depended significantly on the arrangement of the plants, the greater the distance between the plants, the longer the stem was. The largest length of the stem was formed using the placement scheme of 2.4+0.4×0.5 m and 2.2+0.4×0.5 m. Melons grown according to the schemes 2.0+0.4×0.5 and 2.4+0.4×0.5 formed the largest fruit mass and amounted to 2.0 and 1.9 kg, respectively. Plants grown according to the scheme 1.6 +0.4×0.5 had the lowest average yield, where the correspondence of the weight of the fruit to the number of plants per hectare does not ensure a better yield, as in the variants with a different placement scheme. The highest yield was recorded in melon grown according to the scheme of 2.0+0.4×0.5 m, and it was 53.8 t/ha, which is 5.95 t/ha more than in the control variant. The yield was strongly influenced by the distance between the plants, the greater the distance between the plants, the greater the weight of the fruit. Therefore, cultivation of common melon according to the scheme 2.0+0.4×0.5 provides better yield, with rational use of the land area.

References

Бондаренко Г.Л., Яковенко К.І. Методика дослідної справи в овочівництві і баштанництві. Харків : Основа, 2001. 369 с.

Лихацький В.І., Шевчук К.М. Оцінка елементів технології вирощування дині в умовах Південного Степу України. Наукові доповіді Національного університету біоресурсів і природокористування України, 2014, 6. URL: http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Nd_2014_6_13.pdf (дата звернення: 26.02.2025).

Aluko M. Plant population density affect on muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) growth and yield. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2024, 102.3. Р. 425–434.

Ayeni O.S., Makinde E.A., Odeyemi O.M., Sobukola O.P. Plant density due to intra-row spacing on growth, weed control, and yield of Golden melon. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 2021, 27.4. Р. 315–326.

Ban D., Goreta S., Borošić J. Plant spacing and cultivar affect melon growth and yield components. Scientia Horticulturae, 2006, 109.3. Р. 238–243.

Bracy R.P., Parish R.L. Row number, seed spacing, and fertilizer rate effects on melon production. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production, 1997, 3.1. Р. 47–57.

Díaz-Alvarado J.M., Monge-Pérez J.E., Loría-Coto M. Honey Dew melon (Cucumis melo L.) grown under greenhouse conditions: correlation among plant density and yield variables. Revista Tecnología en Marcha, 34(3). Р. 34–50.

Grangeiro L.C., Pedrosa J.F., Neto B.F., Negreiros M.Z.D. Qualidade de híbridos de melão amarelo em diferentes densidades de plantio. Horticultura brasileira, 1999, 17. Р. 110–113.

Lourenção W.A.P., Neves J.F., Dias L.D.E., da Silva Ferreira F., de Lima Toledo C.A., da Silva Ponce F., Júnior S.S. Produção e qualidade de melão amarelo submetido a diferentes sistemas de plantio. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais, 2021, 12.12. Р. 64–73.

Mohamedian S.A., Selim M.A.M., Alian F.S.S. Impact of plant spacing and density on yield and quality of newly local developed cantaloupe F1 hybrids. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor, 2013, 51.4. Р. 391–401.

Paris H.S., Nerson H., Burger Y., Edelstein M., Karchi Z., Mccollum T.G., Cantliffe D.J. Synchrony of yield of melons as affected by plant type and density. Journal of horticultural science, 1988, 63.1. Р. 141–147.

Peralta J.J. Producción y calidad de melón tipo “Harper” a diferentes distancias entre plantas. 2020. PhD Thesis. Zamorano : Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, 2020. P. 7–11.

Pradi Vendruscolo E., Cardoso Campos L.F., Seleguini A., Batista Martins A.P., Ferreira de Lima S. Economic viability of muskmelon cultivation in different planting spacing in Brazil central region. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 2017, 70.3. Р. 8319–8325.

Rodriguez J.C., Shaw N.L., Cantliffe D.J. Influence of plant density on yield and fruit quality of greenhouse-grown galia muskmelons. HortTechnology, 2007, 17.4. Р. 580–585.

Singh A.K., Saver N., Jat G.S., Singh J., Singh V., Singh A., Kumar A. Influence of spacing and pruning on growth, yield and economics of off-season long melon (Cucumis melo). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 92.2. Р. 185–189.

Ugwuoke C.U., Asogwa A.A., Okwo C.R., Onu F.M., Eze G.E., Onah F.C. Effects of Planting Distance and Seed Rate on the Growth and Yield of Egusi Melon (Citrullus colocynthis). Legume Research – An International Journal, 2021, 44.3. Р. 328–333.

Published

2025-05-30