THE INFLUENCE OF SOWING LOCAL APPLICATION OF ORGANIC AMELIORANTS ON THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC PRODUCTIVITY OF SPRING BARLEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2026-1-8Keywords:
spring barley, biochar, sapropel, biohumus, photosynthesisAbstract
Field research was conducted in the period 2023–2025 on the basis of the Kyiv Specialized Branch of the Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination, located in the Bila Tserkva district of Kyiv region. Spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was grown using organic technology, where the predecessor in the crop rotation was meadow clover (Trifolium pratense). Organic ameliorants (biochar, sapropel and biohumus) were applied at a dose of 100 kg ha-1 using a seeder during barley sowing. During three years of research, local application of biochar at sowing contributed to positive changes in the growth and productivity of spring barley: leaf area increased by 6–11 %, plant mass increased by 3–9 %, photosynthetic potential of crops increased by 2–7 %, net productivity of photosynthesis by 3–6 %, and grain yield showed an increase of 2–5 % compared to the control variant, where organic ameliorants were not used. Local application of sapropel at sowing had a positive effect on the agrobiological indicators of spring barley. In particular, an increase in the leaf surface area of plants by 8–13 %, fresh mass by 8–12 %, photosynthetic potential of crops by 5–9 %, and yield by 7–11 %. However, its introduction did not cause significant changes in the net productivity of photosynthesis for the varieties of KWS Krissy and Absolut, although a tendency to improve was observed for the variety of Komandor – by 5 %. The use of biohumus during sowing showed the most pronounced effect (compared to biochar and sapropel) on the intensity of photosynthesis and yield of spring barley. The leaf surface area of spring barley increased by 13–21 %; biomass accumulation – by 12–21 %; photosynthetic potential of crops – by 9–14 %; grain yield – by 12–19 % compared to the control variant without organic ameliorants. Biohumus significantly increased the level of net productivity of photosynthesis for the variety of Komandor – by 21 %, while for the varieties of KWS Krissy and Absolut there was only a tendency to increase – by 3–5 %. Leaf area was strongly positively correlated (r = 0.89–0.95) with spring barley yield during all growing periods, except for earing and waxy maturity, when the correlation was insignificant and moderate (r = 0.05–0.35). Leaf area was also strongly positively correlated with spring barley plant fresh weight (r = 0.73–0.99). Plant biomass accumulation was strongly positively correlated with spring barley yield (r = 0.91–0.99) during all growing phases. Photosynthetic potential of the crop was strongly positively correlated with spring barley yield (r = 0.97) and weakly correlated with net photosynthetic productivity (r = - 0.17). Net photosynthetic productivity was weakly correlated with spring barley yield in this study (r = 0.28). The results of this study should serve to improve and accelerate the implementation of organic spring barley growing technology.
References
Бунчак О. М. Вплив органічних добрив, виготовлених за новітніми технологіями, на продуктивність фотосинтезу пшениці ярої в умовах Західного Лісостепу. Агробіологія. 2018. № 1. С. 171–178. URL: https://agrobiologiya.btsau.edu.ua/sites/default/files/visnyky/agrobiologiya/bunchak-agro-1-2018-171-178_0.pdf (дата звернення: 16.01.2026).
Гавриш С. Л., Бондарева О. Б., Вінюкова О. Б. Ефективність внесення біогумусу підсівом у посівах еспарцету літнього. Корми та кормовиробництво. 2018. № 85. С. 55–62. URL: https://fri.vin.ua/download_materials/catalogues/85.pdf (дата звернення: 27.01.2026).
Іванів М. О., Репілевський Д. Е. Фотосинтетичні показники та урожайність гібридів кукурудзи залежно від елементів технології. Аграрні інновації. 2021. № 4. С. 38–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2020.4.6
Обсяг виробництва, урожайність та зібрана площа сільськогосподарських культур за їх видами по регіонах. URL: https://stat.gov.ua/uk/releases/ploshchi-valovi-zbory-ta-urozhaynist-silskohospodarskykh-kultur (дата звернення: 27.01.2026).
Панфілова А. В. Агроекологічне обґрунтування технологій вирощування пшениці озимої та ячменю ярого за різних систем живлення в умовах Південного Степу України : дис.... доктора с.-г. наук : 06.01.09. Миколаївський національний аграрний університет, Миколаїв; Херсонський державний аграрно-економічний університет, Херсон, 2021. 422 с.
Ушкаренко В. О., Вожегова Р. А., Голобородько С. П., Коковіхін С. В. Методика польового досліду (Зрошуване землеробство). Херсон : Грінь Д.С., 2014. 448 с.
Ушкаренко В. О., Нікішенко В. Л., Голобородько С. П., Коковіхін С. В. Дисперсійний і кореляційний аналіз результатів польових дослідів : монографія. Херсон : Айлант, 2009. 372 с.
Baran A., Tarnawski M., Koniarz T., Jasiewicz C. Agricultural use of sediments from Narożniki reservoir – Yield and concentration of macronutrients and trace elements in the plant. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural. Areas. 2016. № 4. Р. 1217–1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14597/infraeco.2016.4.1.089
Chauhan J., Prathibha M. D., Singh P., Choyal P., Mishra U. N., Saha D., Singhal R. K. Plant photosynthesis under abiotic stresses: Damages, adaptive, and signaling mechanisms. Plant Stress. 2023. № 10. 100296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100296
Chew J., Joseph S., Chen G., Zhang Y., Zhu L., Liu M. Biochar-based fertilizer enhances nutrient uptake and transport in rice seedlings. Sci. Total Environ. 2022. № 826. 154174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154174
Croce R., Carmo-Silva E., Cho Y. B., Ermakova M., Harbinson J., Lawson T., Zhu X. G. Perspectives on improving photosynthesis to increase crop yield. The plant cell. 2024. № 36(10). Р. 3944–3973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae132
Geng L., Li M., Zhang G., Ye L. Barley: a potential cereal for producing healthy and functional foods. Food Quality and Safety. 2022. № 6. fyac012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyac012
Liu X., Zhang J., Wang Q., Chang T., Shaghaleh H., Hamoud Y.A. Improvement of photosynthesis by biochar and vermicompost to enhance tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield under greenhouse conditions. Plants. 2022. № 11(23). 3214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233214
Liužinas R., Jankevičius K., Šalkauskas M., Mikalajūnas M. Improvement of lake sapropel quality: a new method. Geografijos metraštis. 2005. № 38. Р. 44–51. URL: https://gamtostyrimai.lt/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/275_cd3745c8d557ffdbd1fd 8c1950e00035.pdf
Lv J., Xie J., Mohamed A. G. A. Solar utilization beyond photosynthesis. Nat Rev Chem. 2023. № 7. Р. 91–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00448-9
Ravan M. S., Karizaki A. R., Biabani A., Moghaddam A. N., Alamdari E. G. Photosynthetic material remobilization and its contribution to barley yield. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2022. № 57. e02968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2022.v57.02968
Soltan H. A. H., Dakhly O. F., Mahmoud M. A., Fayz Y. F. Microbiological and genetical identification of some vermicompost beneficial associated bacteria. SVU – International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022. № 4(1). Р. 21–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijas.2021.106875.1154
Zhang J., Chen W., Dell B. Wheat genotypic variation in dynamic fluxes of WSC components in different stem segments under drought during grain filling. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015. V. 6. Art. 624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00624
Zhang K., Han X., Fu Y., Khan Z., Zhang B., Bi J., Luo L. Biochar coating promoted rice growth under drought stress through modulating photosynthetic apparatus, chloroplast ultrastructure, stomatal traits and ROS homeostasis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2024. № 216. 109145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109145
Zhang W., Niu W., Luo H. Effect of Biochar Amendment on the Growth and Photosynthetic Traits of Plants Under Drought Stress: A Meta-Analysis. Agronomy. 2024. № 14(12). 2952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122952








