ADVANTAGES AND CHALLENGES OF STUDENT-CENTRED LEARNING IN ARMED CONFLICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37406/2521-6449/2025-2-1Keywords:
student-centered learning, student-centered approach, autonomy, adaptationn, university student, the higher edu- cation students, future foreign language teachersAbstract
The article analyzes the key advantages and challenges of implementing student-centered learning in conditions of armed confl ict. It is argued that student-centered learning functions not only as an educational approach, but also as a necessity that ensures fl exibility, adaptability, and personalized support for each higher education student. The role of this approach is examined in both peacetime and wartime contexts.Particular attention is paid to the development of essential qualities that future professionals should possess. One signifi cant educational benefi t of the student-centered approach is its potential to create eff ective conditions for foreign language acquisition. The individualization of the learning process, student autonomy, and the ability to choose educational materials based on personal interests and needs all contribute to increasing the motivation of future foreign language teachers.Student-centered learning supports the organization of language practice through real communicative situations, signifi cantly enhancing language competence. The approach also actively incorporates interactive methods such as role-playing, debates, interviews, and project-based learning, which not only increase engagement but also eff ectively develop communicative skills.The use of digital resources–such as podcasts, online courses, and subtitled videos–is highlighted as a key component of stu- dent-centered learning, helping to individualize the educational process and address diverse student needs.The study establishes that a crucial element of student-centered learning is ongoing feedback between teachers and students. It concludes that the eff ective implementation of this approach in conditions of armed confl ict is possible only through close collaboration among all partici- pants in the educational process, fl exible learning organization, and the creation of opportunities for each student to realize their full potential.
References
Димань Т. М., Боньковський О. А., Вовкогон А. Г. Європейський простір вищої освіти та Болонський процес. БНАУ; Одеса : НУ «ОМА», 2017. 106 с.
Рашкевич Ю. М. Болонський процес та нова парадигма вищої освіти. Львів : Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2014. 168 с.
Рогач Л., Пєтій Н., Шовак О., Штефанюк Н. Студентоцентроване навчання та кероване викладачем навчання у контексті вивчення англійської як іноземної. Філологічні трактати. 2023. Т. 15. № 1. С. 129–134.
Сорока Ю. Практикуючи студентоцентровану освіту. Вісник ХНУ ім. Каразіна. 2014. № 32 (1101). С. 190–194.
Сосницька Н. Л., Глікман С. В. Студентоцентрований підхід. Науковий вісник льотної академії. 2017. Вип. 1. С. 377–381.
Стеблецький А. Л. Чинники забезпечення якості вищої освіти. Педагогічна освіта. 2020. Вип. 33. С. 31–40.
Bremner N. Learner-centredness. ELT Journal. 2021. Vol. 75. No. 2. P. 213–215.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry. 2000. Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 227–268.
Weimer M. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass, 2013.
Zembylas M. Pedagogy of discomfort. Teaching in Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 27. No. 6. P. 763–776








